Louisiana

Indigent Defense Assistance Board

 

Minutes of the Board Meeting

July 24, 2003

Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Southern University, Room 207

 

Members Present: Duncan S. Kemp, III, Chair; Alfred Boustany; John DiGiulio; Cameron Gamble; Michelle Ghetti; Addison Goff; Donald Phelps; and Richard Sarver.

 

Ex Officio Members Present:  Anthony Champagne and Henry Walker.

 

Staff Present:  Edward R. Greenlee and Marsha Austtun Oliver.

 

Guests Present:  Ben Cohen, Denise LeBoeuf, Jim Looney, Tom Lorenzi, Mike Mitchell,  Kenneth Rodenbeck, Stephen Singer, Clive Stafford Smith, David Utter and Neal Walker.

 

Call to Order and Opening Remarks.  The meeting was called to order at 2:15 p.m. by the Chair.   Ms. Oliver called the roll; a quorum was present.

 

Review and Adoption of Minutes from the February 21, 2003, April 8, 2003 and June 13, 2003 Meetings.  Ms. Ghetti moved to dispense with the reading of the minutes of the previous meetings held on February 21, 2003, April 8, 2003 and June 13, 2003 and that the minutes be adopted.  Mr. Phelps seconded the motion, which passed without objection.  

 

Public Comments. 

 

            David Utter.  Mr. Utter, Director of the Juvenile Justice Project of Louisiana, briefly summarized the history of juvenile indigent defense in Louisiana.  Mr. Utter explained the cost savings realized by providing adequate indigent defense to juveniles and provided examples of the inadequacies of the current juvenile justice system.  Mr. Utter also advised the Board that the U.S. Department of Justice was investigating the State of Louisiana in reference to Sixth Amendment violations of juveniles.  Mr. Utter urged the Board to provide leadership and vision needed in the juvenile justice system in Louisiana.  The Board discussed the current and past funding provided to the JJPL for indigent defense of juveniles.  Ms. Ghetti requested that a discussion of statutory obligations of the LIDAB in regard to juvenile justice be placed on the agenda of the next board meeting.

 

            Tom Lorenzi.  Mr. Lorenzi, a Calcasieu Parish attorney and a member of the Board of Directors of the Louisiana Crisis Assistance Center (LCAC), offered comments regarding the lack of any mechanism in Louisiana’s juvenile justice system to address the needs of mentally retarded juveniles in secure custody.  Mr. Lorenzi also advised the Board of the release of a report on Indigent Defense in Calcasieu Parish funded through a grant from the Standing Committee on Legal Aid and Indigent Defendants on the American Bar Association.  The report cited excessive caseloads, under funding and chronic delays in the judicial system.  Mr. Lorenzi stated that he expects lawsuits to be filed against the 14th Judicial District Indigent Defender Board, the LIDAB, and possibly other state agencies as a result of this report.

 

            Clive Stafford Smith.  Mr. Stafford Smith stated that a lawsuit would soon be filed against the state for violations of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel citing the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Wiggins v. Smith 123 S. Ct. 2527 (2003).  Mr. Stafford Smith further related his experiences with indigent defense in Calcasieu Parish.

 

Litigation Committee.  In response to the comments of Messrs. Lorenzi and Stafford Smith, Mr. Di Giulio moved that a committee be appointed to address the issue of litigation likely to be filed against the LIDAB regarding lack of funding for indigent defense.  Mr. Gamble seconded the motion.  All other board members voted in favor of the motion with the exception of Ms. Ghetti, who opposed the motion.  Mr. Di Giulio, Mr. Glass, Mr. Sarver and Mr. Boustany were appointed to the committee.

 

Proposal of LCAC Board.  Tom Lorenzi of the Board of Directors of the Louisiana Crisis Assistance Center (LCAC) addressed the Board regarding a proposal to merge the LCAC with the Capital Appellate Project (CAP) to form a new organization under the leadership of Neal Walker (currently the director of CAP).  For the purposes of discussion the new organization was referred to as “Capital Defense Services.”  It is proposed that Capital Defense Services (CDS) would provide representation of capital defendants from trial to appeal.  Stephen Singer of the LCAC prepared a memorandum outlining the proposal.  After much discussion concerning possible ethical conflicts in combining trial and appellate services, other state indigent capital defense systems and clarifications of some errors in Mr. Singer’s memo, Mr. Phelps moved that the proposal regarding the merger of the LCAC and CAP be tabled; Ms. Ghetti seconded the motion.  Mr. Di Giulio proposed the motion be amended to refer the merger issue to the capital committee.  Ms. Ghetti seconded the motion as amended and all other board members voted in favor of the amended motion with the exception of Mr. Goff, who opposed the motion.

 

Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Budget.  Mr. Greenlee reviewed the proposed budget for fiscal year 2003-2004.  All programs were budgeted in the same amount as the previous fiscal year except for the amount of funding for the LCAC.  Mr. Greenlee stated that because of the uncertain status of the LCAC due to the pending departure of Mr. Stafford Smith and the proposed merger of the LCAC and CAP, he was recommending that the LCAC be funded in the same amount of the conflict offices, $425,000.00 and that approximately $100,000.00 in unbudgeted funds be paid to the Baton Rouge Capital Conflict Office to assist in providing investigative and legal assistance in the Lee case.  The Board discussed the funding for the LIDAB programs and Mr. Di Giulio moved that the LIDAB funding the LCAC in the amount of $480,000.00 as in the previous fiscal year, subject to the capital committee’s study of the proposed LCAC/CAP merger and other the future of the LCAC; Mr. Sarver seconded the motion, Ms. Ghetti and Mr. Phelps opposed the motion, which passed by a majority.  Mr. Goff moved that the amount of funding to the Juvenile Defender Program be increased in the amount of $40,000.00 to $365,000.00; Ms. Ghetti seconded the motion which passed without opposition.

 

Derrick Todd Lee Case Funding.  Earlier in the meeting the Board voted unanimously to table this issue until after the Board voted on a budget for fiscal year 2003-2004.  Mr. Greenlee updated the Board in regard to his efforts to obtain funding from the legislature and the governor’s office for the defense of Derrick Todd Lee.  To date, no funds had been added to the LIDAB appropriation to provide assistance to the 19th Judicial District Indigent Defender Board for the defense of Mr. Lee.  Michael Mitchell, Chief Indigent Defender in the 19th Judicial District and counsel for Mr. Lee, once again addressed the Board stating that his office needed monetary assistance because it did not have sufficient funds in its budget to provide Mr. Lee with a constitutionally adequate defense and handle all the cases currently pending.  Mr. Mitchell’s budget for this calendar year is approximately $1.7 million and he estimates that he needs a minimum of $800,000.00 to provide Mr. Lee with an adequate defense.  Mr. Stafford Smith interjected to state that there are two other high-profile defendants who have been indicted in East Baton Rouge Parish, the Washington Sniper suspects, and who will require costly representation in each of their capital cases.  After extensive discussion, the Board unanimously voted in favor of a motion made by Mr. Di Giulio and amended by Mr. Gamble and Ms. Ghetti.  The motion provided that the LIDAB acknowledged the need of the 19th JDC Indigent Defender Board for additional monies to fund pending and anticipated capital trials, that, regretfully,  all monies in the LIDAB budget were currently dedicated equitably to programs throughout the state and that, therefore, no monies were available in the LIDAB budget to give the 19th JDC Indigent Defender Board additional monies, and that the Board directed Mr. Greenlee to seek funding “wherever possible on God’s green earth” to supplement the funding the LIDAB is able to provide to the 19th JDC Indigent Defender Board.

 

Capital Post-Conviction Expert Funding.  Denise LeBoeuf advised the Board that the Board of Directors of the Capital Post-Conviction Project of Louisiana (CPCPL) adopted a resolution prohibiting the CPCPL from providing any funds for expert witnesses to civil law firms handling capital post-conviction cases on a pro bono basis and requested that the LIDAB adopt the same policy.  Mr. Di Giulio moved that the Board adopt the resolution of the Board of Directors of the CPCPL prohibiting the CPCPL from providing any funds for expert witnesses to civil law firms handling capital post-conviction cases on a pro bono basis.  Ms. Ghetti seconded the motion which passed without opposition.

 

Other Business.    

 

Determination of Indigency for Application Fee.  John Simmons, Chief Indigent Defender for the 22nd Judicial District expressed concern regarding the need for guidelines for the determination of indigency for implementation of $40.00 application fee.  Mr. Greenlee assured Mr. Simmons that a committee was to be formed immediately to address the issue prior to the effective date of mandated application fee.

 

HR151.  Mr. Greenlee advised the Board that the NLADA Annual Conference in Seattle will feature information about a National Blue Ribbon Commission on indigent defense and past members of state blue ribbon commissions on indigent defense will be present to offer advice to members of Louisiana’s Task Force on Indigent Defense Services which was created by HR151 this past legislative session.  Mr. Greenlee encouraged board members to attend the conference scheduled for November 12-15, 2003.

 

Adjournment.  There being no additional business brought to the attention of the Board, Mr. Boustany moved that the meeting be adjourned.  Mr. Sarver seconded the motion which passed without objection.