Louisiana
Indigent
Defense Assistance Board
Minutes of the Board Meeting
8 October 1998
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
State Capitol
Building—Wimberly Room
Members
Present:
Risley C. Triche, Chair; Thomas A. Casey, Vice-Chair; Michelle Ghetti; Addison
K. Goff, IV; Wayne Lee; Robert McLeod; and Freddie Pitcher.
Ex Officio Members
Present:
Anthony Champagne and Henry Walker.
Staff Present: Jelpi P. Picou, Jr.
Call to Order
and Opening Remarks. The meeting was called to
order at 1:04 p.m. by the Chair, who welcomed members to the meeting of the
Indigent Defense Assistance Board; roll call demonstrated that a quorum was
present.
Approval of
Minutes of Previous Meeting. Mr. Lee
moved that the minutes of the May 14, 1998 meeting be approved. Mr. Goff seconded the motion, which passed
without objection.
Review of
District Assistance Fund Distributions. The staff
distributed a working list of the districts eligible for district assistance
and the preliminary amounts each district could receive if an application was
made and approved. No action was
necessary on this calculation until the final caseload and financial records
were forwarded to the staff from the eligible indigent defender boards.
Review of
LIDAB Programs. The staff reviewed the
capital, expert, and technical assistance programs, noting that the Board was
within budget for each of these programs.
There were several questions concerning the amount of money being spent
on capital defense, which the staff explained was the result of increasing numbers
of prosecutions, a stand-still budget, and prolonged cases that the Board was
carrying from previous years.
There was
also much discussion concerning capital post-conviction, including a letter
written to the Board by District Attorney Doug Moreau requesting information on
the Board's funding policy in this area.
At Mr. McLeod's suggestion, the Chair directed the staff to prepare a
letter to respond to Mr. Moreau's request.
The staff
also noted that there were presently eight defendants on death row who did not
have post-conviction counsel and that the LIDAB simply had no budget to cover
the costs of representation. Mr.
Pitcher opined that the Board, if it were responsible for covering these costs,
might need to look for emergency funding from the state. Several members of the Board agreed that the
LIDAB needed to study this issue closely and perhaps secure funding for these
services.
Review of
Operational Plan and Budget. The staff
circulated a draft copy of the Board's Fiscal Year 1998-1999 continuation
budget packet, with a total request of $10 million. The Board studied the proposed budget carefully and had questions
concerning, among other items, the addition of one staff position and the
request for post-conviction funding.
The staff explained that the
addition of one position was a direct result of the demands made upon the
office in relation to the Division of Administration procedures, the
professional contracts law, and the reporting requirements of the Governor's
Office.
The request for
post-conviction funds, it was noted, included billing in post-conviction cases
that were not being paid but that the staff felt would need to be satisfied if
monies were forthcoming from the legislature.
Thus the budget request included both past bills and expected billing in
this area.
The Board
completed its review of the preliminary budget proposal and recommended to the
staff that it forward the final versions to the Board Chair and Finance
Committee Chair.
Planning for
Upcoming Legislative Session. The staff
noted three areas of concern in the upcoming session: appropriations (discussed
above), professional contracts law, and indigent defender board funding. The staff recommended that it be allowed to
develop a proposal for removing the Board from the professional contracts
provisions of the law to facilitate representation of indigents. It was explained that contracts would
continue to be required between attorneys and the Board but would not need to
be subject to administrative review by the Office of Contract Review. The Board discussed the matter and directed
the staff to study the issue and report back at a later date.
The staff
next presented the issue of court cost funding of indigent defender boards,
noting that with recent changes in the law, the judges of a district had
discretion to set the court costs for indigent defender boards between $17.50
and $30, with only five districts having raised those assessments to the
maximum. It was noted that a change in
the law, mandating a single figure, would make fee collections equitable
throughout the state and produce additional revenue for the district
boards. After several questions on this
issue, the staff noted that it was not advocating a raise in the amount of
court costs, only a single amount across the board. The Board directed the staff to study the issue further and
report back at a later date.
Other
Business. The Chair noted that
Representative Audrey McCain had been invited to the meeting to discuss the
legislative study committee on capital post-conviction but had been delayed by
an emergency. The Chair directed the
staff to invite Representative McCain to the next meeting and also to invite
James Looney, Esq., the Director of the Louisiana Appellate Project, for an
update on that Project's work.
Scheduling
of the next meeting was discussed, with the Chair directing that the next
meeting be held on Thursday, December 3, 1998 at a place in New Orleans. The staff stated that it would send out
notices.
Adjournment. There being no additional
business brought to the attention of the Board, the Chair entertained a motion
to adjourn, which was seconded and passed without objection.